Thursday, May 29, 2014

WAS DAVID FLEMING CHEATED IN THE ELECTION?



29 MAY 2014, Vol.1, No.57 > WAS DAVID FLEMING CHEATED IN THE ELECTION?

The POCAHONTAS CRIER
‘When the Righteous succeed the people rejoice,
But when the bad govern, men groan!’ – Proverbs 29:2
[New Email address: pocahontascrier88@gmail.com]


WAS DAVID FLEMING CHEATED IN THE ELECTION?

While it is no secret that this iconoclastic ‘muckraking’ Internet Blog publicly endorsed NORMAN LEE ALDERMAN (Rep-SD) & PATTI HEINEMANN (Dem-ND) for county commissioners in the recent Primary Election – we also believe in Liberty & Social Justice For All – and that even includes incumbent David Fleming (Dem-ND), in spite of our many differences with him, his commissions & omissions, and his disastrous-policies, as well as all the other candidates regardless of political, social or organizational affiliations, etc.  Of particular interest however is that although David lost the election by about 75 votes to David McLaughlin, reports are still coming into us about possible ‘VOTER FRAUD’ whereby persons desiring to vote for a candidate of their choice, often found that they could not get the ‘electronic-touch-screen’ to place a ‘check-mark’ next to their candidate choice since the machine kept making a ‘check-mark’ next to the name of another candidate instead!  And yes, this now reportedly occurred to persons voting for David Fleming! 

In fact, it’s now commonly known by the poll-watchers at the Green Bank precinct at the Green Bank Elementary School, and the area citizens listening to the commotion while waiting to also vote at the Green Bank precinct, that one lady was so irate that she demanded both the Republican & Democrat ‘poll-watchers’ to surround the electronic-voting-machine and ACTUALLY WATCH HER TRYING TO ‘TOUCH -SCREEN’ NEXT TO FLEMING’S NAME – ONLY TO HAVE THE MACHINE PLACE THE ‘CHECK-MARK’ NEXT TO THE NAME OF SOMEONE ELSE!  Normally the ‘poll-watchers’ refuse to look at the ‘touch-screen’ while a person is voting – EVEN IF THE VOTER COMPLAINS ABOUT THE ‘TOUCH-SCREEN’ – but this time it was an exception since the lady was SO IRATE!  The squeaking wheel usually does get oil after all.  But in this case, after repeated attempts, one of the poll-workers pulled the little-cartridge out, and then pushed it back in again so that the entire process had to be started-over for the Voter and ‘this time it worked’ and the lady-voter was able to cast her ballot for the folks she wanted to receive her vote.

Now just imagine this a couple of dozen times at the other precincts around the county whereby folks had to keep hitting the ‘touch-screen’ multiple times for the candidate they wanted, instead of the one who actually got the ‘check-mark’, and it becomes just another reason why WE SHOULD GO BACK TO PAPER-BALLOTS PLACED IN A LOCKED PLEXIGLASS-BOX and counted properly in this county!  Let’s face it, we are not a major city precinct nor large county and the highest percentage of voters in the last two decades RARELY has exceeded 2600 total voters, or less than 50% of the total of those eligible to vote or even registered to vote!  So it is not like it would take days or weeks to determine an accurate vote total via paper-ballots as found in many foreign countries!

Even our previous voting system whereby voters had a heavy-large-pencil to check or fill-in the box next to a candidate’s name, then that voting ballot-card was run through an electronic-reader that picked up the voter-marks on the ballot – WAS BETTER THAN THE CURRENT ‘TOUCH-SCREENS’ – since not only was the paper-ballots to be marked-off easier to read, quicker to vote, but also VERIFIABLE when & if required to have a ‘hand-count’!  And keep in mind that during that period of time, TWO PRECINCTS were chosen at random, than hand-counted at a public meeting by the county commission – and IF any precinct was off by as little as 1% or 2%  -- then the entire county was COUNTED BY HAND in order to receive an official & accurate vote count.  And some elections, as many may remember, were as close as seven votes OR LESS!

Now we are supposed to believe that the ‘touch-screen’ is a more accurate way, especially since it shows your vote in a small window on the lower-left-side and it’s supposed to be a ‘paper-record’ on the INSIDE of the machine – but who really knows for sure?  As reported on this Internet Blog before, ANYTHING ELECTRONIC can be altered in one form or another, by magnets, electro or otherwise, and of course internal programming that can be altered in a matter of seconds as compared to the older mechanical voting machines which could be rigged to cast every other vote, every third vote, or every tenth vote, etc., to whomever the machine was programmed for to win!  Again, THAT’S WHY paper-ballots returned to the voting process until the new-electronic-voting machines came into use!  And let’s face it, the largest producers of electronic-voting machines also manufacture the SLOT MACHINES for casinos – and we all know what the odds are in favor of the casinos compared to the customer-gamblers!  We’d all have a better chance at getting hit by lightening, or a falling tree, or a falling meteor than winning on a Slot Machine!

Lastly, another irony that has surfaced since the recent primary election, amidst the normal ‘rumors’ about vote fraud, comes from campaign workers and those volunteers who made telephone call surveys & solicitations for the candidate of their choice only to report that after making as many as 550+ calls, they only found 3 or 4 responses in favor of a particular candidate – yet the final results showed the candidates with the least support over the phone getting more votes than did those candidates who got the best results in the telephone call surveys & solicitations.  Dose that mean that folks LIE over the telephone and do something else in the voting booth?  Or that they LIE on the phone and DON’T VOTE?  Either way, it’s the same results for it’s just another example of how the ‘powers-that-be’ make sure THEY WIN and WE THE PEOPLE LOSE! Fleming thought his ‘friends’ & his bootlicking for the GVEDC would carry the day for him – BUT IT DIDN’T – whether by hook or crook!  As did Buster Varner thinking the ‘block-vote’ of the secret-societies would carry the day for him via his lodge-membership – BUT IT DIDN’T!  Both Fleming & Varner were stabbed in the back by those they thought they could count on – AND FOR WHAT – two candidates with weaker fortitude, the least governing experience, and virtual ‘hand-puppets’ for the GVEDC and the ‘Poverty Preservation Society’ (PPS) yet again!

   
THAT’S WHY…

On 04 NOVEMBER…there’s no excuse…
 IT’S YOUR CHOICE…
TO CHANGE THINGS FOR THE BETTER!

Just say ‘NO’ to those who want to keep this county in Poverty & Pauperism
– and –
Just say ‘YES’ to real Progress & Prosperity for the future!

On Primary Day – YOU have a chance to elect two persons that will always put YOU first!  They know that:

THE GREATER COMMON GOOD ALWAYS COMES BEFORE SELF OR ANY SELF-SERVING SPECIAL INTERESTS!

Keep up to Date – Stay tuned to these Websites:




   On 04 NOVEMBER it doesn’t matter how you are registered – YOU CAN VOTE for:

CHARLES WILFONG – ND
&
NORMAN LEE ALDERMAN - SD

The Pocahontas Crier is an independent Internet News Service that has now endorsed
two candidates for County Commission
      CHARLES WILFONG & NORMAN LEE ALDERMAN  
in addition to providing in depth news reporting on important issues directly affecting the Citizens of Pocahontas County!

Email comments & suggestions to: pocahontascrier88@gmail.com  

The Pocahontas Crier is a free, non-subscription, Internet News Service meant for entertainment in the true ‘muckraking’ tradition of questioning authority, challenging corruption, and offering Common Sense Alternatives for The Greater Common Good before Self or any Special Interests!  We struggle for Social Justice on all levels and are part of The Crier Coalition of Internet News Services comprised of The Pocahontas Commentator, The Pocahontas Crier, Signal Fires of WV, Rolling Thunder &  Echoes from the Holl’r.


Saturday, May 24, 2014

THANK YOU VOTERS...at least to those of you who voted for...!



24 MAY 2014, Vol.1, No.56 > THANK YOU VOTERS…at least to those of you who voted for…!

The POCAHONTAS CRIER
‘When the Righteous succeed the people rejoice,
But when the bad govern, men groan!’ – Proverbs 29:2
[New Email address: pocahontascrier88@gmail.com]


THANK YOU VOTERS…at
least to those of you who voted for…!


The Editorial Staff of The Pocahontas Crier wishes to say THANK YOU to each of you smart enough to vote in the Primary Election for county commission candidates NORMAN LEE ALDERMAN (Rep-SD) & PATTI HEINEMANN (Dem-ND) who ran a joint campaign setting forth all the issues that could bring this county OUT OF POVERTY & PAUPERISM and INTO PROGRESS & PROSPERITY!  While NORMAN WON his primary election for the Southern District, PATTI Lost her election bid in the Northern District – but at least everyone got to see the 15 POINTS that can make a change for the better – if & when ever implemented!  Those same 15 POINTS – as STEPS FORWARD – are now on the shoulders of NORMAN as he heads into the General Election scheduled for 04 November 2014!  Hopefully enough Voters will Elect Norman so he can begin the groundwork for restoring this county to good government!   

Of the total number of persons registered to vote in this county, a little less than 25% actually voted – which is disgraceful from an international point of view where people are still struggling & dying for the chance to vote for a candidate of their choice – but it’s typical of the trend in voting within this State and particularly within this county!  Let’s face it, a vast number of folks in Pocahontas County don’t even have a television, let alone a computer or know how to even use a computer to get on the Internet – so life outside of their own private-universe does not exist as far as they are concerned!  And this does not even include those folks that rank as ‘functionally-illiterate’ – lacking reading-skills – in comparison to those in other counties bordering Pocahontas County and beyond!  And then, after all that, you add those numbers to the folks that have religious beliefs that keep them from the greater community participation, and clinging only within their own-cloistered-communities which do not vote, and you can see why just a small handful of folks – organized within their so-called ‘secret-brotherhoods & sisterhoods’ – you know, the ‘lodge-folks’ – and you can see just how THINGS NEVER CHANGE HERE IN POCAHONTAS COUNTY – for the better that is!

As set forth throughout the primary campaign, one of the main reasons THINGS NEVER CHANGE HERE is the fact that the same ‘scheisse’ keeps getting recycled over & over!  Is not doing the same thing over & over again and expecting a different result the very definition of ‘STUPIDITY’?  So why are we surprised with the same results again & again!  All you need in a ‘FEUDAL SOCIETY’ is one or two folks to give the orders and everyone else falls in line – by whatever title they wish to go by, be it Dictator, Boss Man, Warlord, Potentate, Worshipful Master, CEO, Owner, or whatever ad nauseam – just you wait until DONALD TRUMP becomes the ‘big mamaluka’!  And this county is full of such SELF-SERVING SPECIAL INTERESTS!  Look around – you don’t have to look very far!

Look around indeed!  At one time Marlinton considered itself ‘richer’ & ‘superior’ to Durbin, but if someone were blindfolded and taken to each town and had their blindfolds removed – is there any difference anymore?  And what is the solution?  Try and force folks behind on their ‘town-bills’ to pay up or else!  Or else what?  Have their respective water turned off?  How will that help ANYONE TO LIVE BETTER in Marlinton or Durbin?  OR…WILL IT DRIVE MORE FOLKS AWAY?  Common Sense should have told the folks in Durbin a long time ago that they would be FAR BETTER OFF becoming UNINCORPORATED especially since they ‘lost-their-town-charter’ and can no longer show a legal-line-of-continuity from one local ordinance to another – let alone have the so-called ‘town-council’ try & force folks on a ‘fixed-income’ to pay for past, present & future ‘town-bills’ while the folks on the ‘town-council’ exempt themselves!  Getting rid of the mayor, town-council, and the associated costs involved employing them would go a far lot further economically than trying to force folks to pay what they can no longer afford!  But there are a few SELF-SERVING SPECIAL INTERESTS that own almost everything at the expense of everyone else that now wants to force everyone else to pay what most cannot afford!  Why & how?  Where is the Common Sense in this scenario?  Who in their right mind would want to move to Durbin – for any reason – let alone try and start a business there and have to pay all kinds of ‘town-fees’ & such?  Same goes with Marlinton and its ‘business-taxes’ – but LOOK – everyone is still walking back & forth in their own RUT!  What’s a RUT?  Simply a GRAVE with both ends open!  Instead of ‘debtor’s prisons’ – where folks were put into dungeons just because they were ‘HAVE-NOTS’ by the ‘HAVES’ – now we just shut off water & electric and whatever else we can do TO the poorer members of our society – and we expect THAT to improve our over all condition!  WHATEVER HAPPENDED TO THE ‘GOLDEN-RULE’?  But, as you can see on Sundays, the ‘HAVES’ are the first in church praising their ‘wealthiness’ at the expense of everyone else!  

This ‘feudal-mentality’ has all but ruined this county in the last three-four-decades as more folks have had to MOVE OUT than MOVE IN since the majority of most everyone is now at or near the bottom on a ‘fixed-income’ and/or on a minimum-wage’!  Meanwhile the county infrastructure is rusting & rotting away with no end in sight – unless it collapses & we all just walk away!  The irony is that the folks that have grabbed what they could for themselves – with little to no thought of others – now find themselves also caught between the proverbial ‘rock & hard-place’!  Why?  Because for them to stay in this county – they will either have to fork over some of their horded-funds, or also be swept aside!  When Buster Varner is the only ‘businessman’ left in Durbin – WHO will pay the business-taxes, water & sewer, and garbage & maintenance fees?  And WHO will be his customers for him to stay in profit?  Will he then be able to pay his ‘fair-share’ as he claims each one on a ‘fixed-income’ should now be forced to do?  Is this criticism of Buster for trying to bring products & services that no one else has been able to afford to bring to the Durbin area?  NO – but it is a ‘Reality-Check’ as to just how far we are willing to go to get ‘blood-out-of-a-stone’!

And the same goes for Richardson’s Hardware & Mitchell’s Chevrolet in Marlinton if & when they too are the only businesses left standing after the NEXT FLOOD!  It is the same scenario faced by all small communities faced with a rapidly-shrinking population and a collapsing infrastructure!  Does anyone really think it will improve when the likes of DONALD TRUMP turns his soon-to-be privately-owned Snowshoe-RAD (Resort Area District) into just another of his ‘Trump-Casinos’ – this time in the middle of nowhere?  If you’ve ever been to Atlantic City, then you’ve seen firsthand what glitzy lights along the boardwalk look like compared to the SLUMS in the rest of the city!  If you think Poverty & Pauperism is bad now – just wait until a ‘four-lane’ rips this county in half, and EVERYTHING GOES TO THE MOUNTAIN & BACK AGAIN & no where else!  We’ve heard that ‘Tourism’ is so great for our county – so is that why Frontier Communications has provided BROADBAND TO SNOWSHOE FIRST – instead of anywhere else?  Thanks Reta Griffith for SERVING YOURSELF & SPECIAL INTERESTS before your neighbors by selling us all into Frontier’s Monopoly!  Once the ‘Trump Casino’ is completed, it is set to be sold to the owner of ‘The Greenbrier Inn – Casino’ – so take a good look at White Sulphur next time going to Lewisburg and see just how much and how fast ‘the wealth’ of ‘The Greenbrier’ has trickled down to the rank & file!  How do you think Snowshoe-RAD will improve your life here?  Apparently no one was interested or capable of understanding the WORKERS COOP for taking over Snowshoe & Silver Creek for the benefit of the State of West Virginia and the people of this County as set forth by Norman & Patti in the recent primary campaign – so now see what you really get!

And all this goes for DAVID McLAUGHLIN & BILL BEARD as candidates for county commission!  What does DAVID know about ‘running a government’ when he has spend his adult life looking at the REAR-END of CATTLE and DRIVING AROUND IN CIRCLES delivering his mail routes?  The quick answer:  NOT A DAMN THING as he showed in the primary election by having no imagination or explanation for anything asked of him!  But he was elected anyway since he’s a ‘nice-guy’ who will simply follow orders and do what he is told by the SELF-SERVING SPECIAL INTERESTS!  The same goes for Bill Beard as he has demonstrated in the months since his appointment to replace the late Dolan Irvine – you remember Dolan don’t you?  He was the County Assessor that NEVER RAISED HIS OWN PROPERTY TAXES A SINGLE PENNY IN OVER 25 YEARS – while he slowly raised everyone else in the county every three (3) years from 19% - 31%!   Check out your square-footage & acreage between when Dolan took office & when he died!  And then folks wonder why things only seem to be getting worse instead of better in this county – yet the ‘Secret-Society-Block-Vote’ keeps RECYCLING the same thieves election after election who only serve themselves at the expense of everyone else!  Still think things are great – just wait until your PROPERTY TAXES DOUBLE so the school officials can raise their salaries at your expense! Does anyone still think that Pocahontas County isn’t run the same as a Medieval-Feudal-Fiefdom?

THAT’S WHY…

On 04 NOVEMBER…there’s no excuse…
 IT’S YOUR CHOICE…
TO CHANGE THINGS FOR THE BETTER!

Just say ‘NO’ to those who want to keep this county in Poverty & Pauperism
– and –
Just say ‘YES’ to real Progress & Prosperity for the future!

On Primary Day – YOU have a chance to elect two persons that will always put YOU first!  They know that:

THE GREATER COMMON GOOD ALWAYS COMES BEFORE SELF OR ANY SELF-SERVING SPECIAL INTERESTS!

Keep up to Date – Stay tuned to these Websites:




   On 04 NOVEMBER it doesn’t matter how you are registered – YOU CAN VOTE for:

CHARLES WILFONG – ND
&
NORMAN LEE ALDERMAN - SD

The Pocahontas Crier is an independent Internet News Service that has now endorsed
two candidates for County Commission
      CHARLES WILFONG & NORMAN LEE ALDERMAN  
in addition to providing in depth news reporting on important issues directly affecting the Citizens of Pocahontas County!

Email comments & suggestions to: pocahontascrier88@gmail.com  

The Pocahontas Crier is a free, non-subscription, Internet News Service meant for entertainment in the true ‘muckraking’ tradition of questioning authority, challenging corruption, and offering Common Sense Alternatives for The Greater Common Good before Self or any Special Interests!  We struggle for Social Justice on all levels and are part of The Crier Coalition of Internet News Services comprised of The Pocahontas Commentator, The Pocahontas Crier, Signal Fires of WV, Rolling Thunder &  Echoes from the Holl’r.


Thursday, May 22, 2014

THE CITIZEN-JURY HANDBOOK!



22 MAY 2014, Vol.1, No.55 > THE CITIZEN-JURY HANDBOOK!  

The POCAHONTAS CRIER
‘When the Righteous succeed the people rejoice,
But when the bad govern, men groan!’ – Proverbs 29:2
[New Email address: pocahontascrier88@gmail.com]


The Citizen-Jury Handbook!


JURY HANDBOOK
LINCOLN said "Study the Constitution…Let it be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislatures, and enforced in courts of justice."
RIGHTS COME FROM OUR CREATOR…
NOT FROM THE GOVERNMENT!

"You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe." John Adams,
Second President of the United States
TABLE of CONTENTS
Section III ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS
INDEX TO THE DOCUMENTS
Section I
A HANDBOOK FOR JURORS
Jury Duty!
The purpose of this information is to revive, as Jefferson put it,
‘The Ancient Principles.’  It is not designed to promote lawlessness or a return to the jungle.  The ‘Ancient Principles’ refer to the Ten Commandments and the Common Law.  The Common Law is, in simple terms, just plain common sense and has its roots in the Ten Commandments, Statutes & Judgments of The Divine Law.
In 1776 we came out of BONDAGE with FAITH, UNDERSTANDING and COURAGE.  Even against great odds, and with much bloodshed, we battled our way to achieve LIBERTY.  LIBERTY is that delicate area between the force of government and FREEWILL of man.  LIBERTY brings FREEDOM of choice to work, to trade, to go and live wherever one wishes; it leads to ABUNDANCE.  ABUNDANCE, if made an end in itself, will result in COMPLACENCY which leads to APATHY.   APATHY is the ‘let someone else do it’ philosophy.  This always brings DEPENDENCY.  For a period of time, dependents are often not aware they are dependent.  They delude themselves by thinking they are still free – ‘We never had it so good…We can still vote, can 't we?’ attitude! Eventually abundance diminishes and DEPENDENCY becomes known by its true nature: BONDAGE!
There are few ways out of bondage.  Bloodshed and war often result, but Our Founding Fathers learned of a better way.  Realizing that a CREATOR is always above and greater than that which He creates, they established a three vote system by which an informed Citizenry can control those acting in the name of government.  To be a good master you must always remember the true ‘pecking order’ or chain of command in this nation is supposed to be as follows:
1. Our Creator created man...
2. Man (that's you) created the Constitution…
3. The Constitution created government...
4. Government created corporations...etc.
Now while according to Our Founding Fathers the base of power is supposed to always remain in the hands of WE THE PEOPLE, unfortunately it is now almost lost over the last half-century to those Predatory-Corporations acting in the name of government, that finance politicians, bureaucrats, judges, and lawyers, etc.  Corporations can now spend as much as they want to buy political favors, policies, and politicians – since the case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876 (21Jan2010) went into effect!  Our ‘REPUBLIC’ as given to us by Our Founding Fathers has now slipped into Corporate Fascism = Corporatist State = Oligarchy Capitalism = Mafia Capitalism = Crony Capitalism = Disaster Capitalism = Monopoly Totalitarianism! 

And as has been seen increasingly within the halls of congress and numerous state legislatures within the USA to date, the Constitution and the Laws of this Country are being shredded in the drive to wipeout Organized Labor Unions and usher in total ‘Corporate Fascism’ at every level of society!  BUT, wherever there is action there is a reaction and for the first time in more than six-decades – there are now millions of folks no longer afraid to being labeled a “neo-this or that” – so kindly be fair-warned that what you may learn from this summary may go a long way in opening some folks eyes as to what the “Marxist-Communists”, “Zionist-Capitalists”, “Corporate Media”, “Predatory Cartels”, “Corporate Fascists”, “Corporatist State” &  All Totalitarians  DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW!  But in the words of Our Redeemer, “The Truth shall set you Free!”  Knowledge is Power, and Ignorance (lack-of-knowledge) is Poverty & Pauperism!  The following is for educational purposes to awaken folks to the realities of what is taking place at all levels of society, where a few want everything at the expense of everyone else:

1.     A society that is totally ‘capitalist’ is one that is totally ‘privatized’ whereby nothing is held in common by the general population – but everything and every aspect is privately-owned by some individual, family, corporation or cartel that then arbitrarily sets the price that each person in society has to pay for any given product or service.  This is ‘Corporate Fascism’ & the ‘Corporatist State’ via its monopoly over every aspect of society where decrees & mandates & ‘executive orders’ dictate policy – there are no democratic decisions & the very opposite of a ‘Democratic-Republic’!

2.     A society that is totally ‘communist’ is also one that is totally ‘privatized’ whereby nothing is held in common by the general population – but where everything and every aspect is privately-owned, yet claimed to be held in the name of the people by some ‘oligarchy’ that then arbitrarily sets the price that each person in society has to pay for any given product or service.   This too is a ‘Corporatist State’ via its monopoly over every aspect of society where decrees & mandates & ‘executive orders’ dictate policy – there are no democratic decisions & it’s also the very opposite of a ‘Democratic-Republic’!

3.     In both types of societies, the supreme power rests in the hands of a few persons, an ‘Oligarchy’, who by virtue of their supreme wealth become a ‘Plutocracy’, and since nothing is held in common with the rank & file Citizens – a government of thieves known as a ‘Kleptocracy’ that also functions within a ‘culture of corruption’!  

  1. And most importantly of all, whether ‘capitalist or communist’, both types of totalitarianism find their roots in Babylonian Talmudism, as set forth in the ‘Protocols of Zion’, when disclosed at the turn of the last Century; see the full text of all 24 Protocols. < http://educate-yourself.org/cn/protocolsofsion.shtml >

5.     Zionist-Karl Marx was to ‘communism’ what Zionist-Milton Friedman was to ‘capitalism’both systems need totalitarianism to fully succeed in their monopoly control over raw materials, labor & production – and both systems are maintained by an ‘Oligarchy’ that becomes a ‘Plutocracy’ that falls into a ‘Kleptocracy’ before an economic, political & social collapse – or a military defeat by a foreign enemy!

As a result America has begun to function under ‘corporate-fascism’ instead of remaining a DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLIC!  But even so, at this late date, we still have a THREE-PRONG SYSTEM whereby we can try and maintain a ‘checks & balances’ system!  Because of the BILLIONS of dollars now spent on elections, as a people we are now being given only the candidates that the ruling ‘Kleptocracy’ places before us – and it can be seen taking place from the national level to the state level to the local level – thus trying to VOTE for a change is becoming more & more difficult!  BUT when it comes to the SECOND & THIRD PRONGS, we still have the option to ‘JUST SAY NO’ whenever we think a law is bad and should be nullified – whether on a Grand Jury or in a Courtroom-Jury!  Because this POWER still rests in the hands of a JURY – there are rumors in the corporate-media that the ‘courts’ want to change FROM a JURY back TO a JUDGE or TRIBUNAL of Three-Judges – just as found in Medieval Times and in the former Soviet Union!  By the time that arrives, or shortly, thereafter, we as a people may have risen up in a Second War for Independence against all things ‘corporate’!  In the meantime, our check on ‘tyranny’, is as follows:
Our FIRST VOTE is at the polls on Election Day when we pick those who are to represent us in the seats of government.  But what can be done if those elected officials don't perform as promised or expected?  Well, the second two votes are the most effective means by which the common people of any nation on earth have ever had in controlling those appointed to serve them in government.
The SECOND VOTE comes when you serve on a Grand Jury.  Before anyone can be brought to trial for a capital or infamous crime by those acting in the name of government, permission must be obtained from people serving on the Grand Jury!  The Minneapolis Star and Tribune in the March 27th 1987 edition noted a purpose of the Grand Jury this way:  A grand jury's purpose is to protect the public from an overzealous prosecutor.’
The THIRD VOTE is the most powerful vote; this is when you are acting as a jury member during a courtroom trial.  At this point, "the buck stops" with you!  It is in this setting that each JUROR has MORE POWER than the President, all of Congress, and all of the judges combined!  Congress can legislate (make law), the President or some other bureaucrat can make an order or issue regulations, and judges may instruct or make a decision, but no JUROR can ever be punished for voting ‘Not Guilty!’  Any JUROR can, with impunity, choose to disregard the instructions of any judge or attorney in rendering his vote.  If only one JUROR should vote ‘Not Guilty’ for any reason, there is no conviction and no punishment at the end of the trial.  Thus, those acting in the name of government must come before the common man to get permission to enforce a law.

YOU ARE ABOVE THE LAW!
As a JUROR in a trial setting, when it comes to your individual vote of innocent or guilty, you truly are answerable only to GOD ALMIGHTY.  The First Amendment to the Constitution was born out of this great concept.  However, judges of today refuse to inform JURORS of their RIGHTS.  The Minneapolis Star and Tribune in a news paper article appearing in its November 30th 1984 edition, entitled: "What judges don't tell the juries" stated:
"At the time of the adoption of the Constitution, the jury's role as defense against political oppression was unquestioned in American jurisprudence.  This nation survived until the 1850's when prosecutions under the Fugitive Slave Act were largely unsuccessful because juries refused to convict."
"Then judges began to erode the institution of free juries, leading to the absurd compromise that is the current state of the law.  While our courts uniformly state juries have the power to return a verdict of not guilty whatever the facts, they routinely tell the jurors the opposite."
"Further, the courts will not allow the defendants or their counsel to inform the jurors of their true power.  A lawyer who made...Hamilton's argument would face professional discipline and charges of contempt of court."
"By what logic should juries have the power to acquit a defendant but no right to know about the power?  The court decisions that have suppressed the notion of jury nullification cannot resolve this paradox."
"More than logic has suffered.  As originally conceived, juries were to be a kind of safety valve, a way to soften the bureaucratic rigidity of the judicial system by introducing the common sense of the community.  If they are to function effectively as the 'conscience of the community,' jurors must be told that they have the power and the right to say no to a prosecution in order to achieve a greater good.  To cut jurors off from this information is to undermine one of our most important institutions."
"Perhaps the community should educate itself.  Then Citizens called for jury duty could teach the judge a needed lesson in civics."

This information is designed to bring to your attention one important way our nation's founders provided to insure that you, not the growing army of politicians, judges, lawyers, and bureaucrats, rule this nation.  It will focus on the true power you possess as a JUROR, how you got it, why you have it, and remind you of the basis on which you must decide not only the facts placed in evidence but also the validity or application of every law, rule, regulation, ordinance, or instruction given by any man seated as a judge or attorney when you serve as a JUROR.
One JUROR can stop tyranny with a ‘NOT GUILTY VOTE!’  He can nullify bad law in any case, by ‘HANGING THE JURY!’
“I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do something.  What I can do, I should do and, with the help of God, I will do!” – Everett Hale
The only power the judge has over the JURY is their ignorance!
WE THE PEOPLE’, must relearn a desperately needed lesson in civics. The truth of this question has been answered by many testimonies and historical events. Consider the following:
JURY RIGHTS
"The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy." John Jay, 1st Chief Justice, United States Supreme Court, 1789
"The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts." Samuel Chase, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1796, Signer of the unanimous Declaration
"The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both law and fact." Oliver Wendell Holmes, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1902
"The law itself is on trial quite as much as the cause which is to be decided." Harlan F. Stone, 12th Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court, 1941
"The pages of history shine on instance of the jury's exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions of the judge..." U.S. v Dougherty, 473 F 2nd 113, 1139, (1972)

LAW OF THE LAND
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land.  The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement.  It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows:
‘All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.’‘ -- Marbury v Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
‘Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them’, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
‘An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no right; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.’
Norton v Shelby County, 118 US 425 p.442
‘The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, in  reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.  No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.’ 16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177 late 2nd, Section 256

A SUMMARY OF
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS
The TEN COMMANDMENTS represent GOD'S GOVERNMENT OVER MAN! GOD commands us for our own good to give up wrongs and not rights!  HIS system always results in LIBERTY and FREEDOM!  The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are built on this foundation, which provides for punitive justice.  It is not until one damages another's person or property that he can be punished.  The Marxist system leads to bondage and GOD'S system leads to LIBERTY!  Read very carefully:
     1. Thou shalt have no other deities before
Me.
2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image.
3. Thou shalt not take the name of your Creator in vain.
4. Remember the Sabbath to keep it Holy.
5. Honor thy father and mother.
6. Thou shalt not murder.
7. Thou shalt not commit adultery
8. Thou shalt not steal.
9. Thou shalt not bear false witness.
10. Thou shalt not covet.
Directly above the Chief Justice's chair is a tablet signifying the TEN COMMANDMENTS.  When the Speaker of the House in the U.S. Congress looks up, his eyes look into the face of Moses. "The Bible is the Book upon which this Republic rests." – Andrew Jackson, Seventh President of the United States
"The moral principles and precepts contained in the Scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitutions and laws.  All the miseries and evils which men suffer from, vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war, proceed from the despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible."  Noah Webster
A SUMMARY OF
THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO
The Communist Manifesto represents a misguided philosophy, which teaches the Citizens to give up their RIGHTS for the sake of the ‘government’ which always ends in a police state.  This is called preventive justice.  Control is the key concept.  Read carefully:
1. Abolition of private property.
2. Heavy progressive income tax.
3. Abolition to all rights of
inheritance.
4. Confiscation of property of all
emigrants and rebels.
5. A Central bank
6. Government control of Communications and Transportation
7. Government ownership of factories and agriculture.
8. Government control of labor.
9. Corporate farms, regional planning.
10. Free education for all children in
Government-controlled schools

THE GREATER COMMON GOOD BEFORE SELF OR ANY SPECIAL INTERESTS!
When the people fear the government you have tyranny; when the government fears the people, you have liberty.
Politicians, bureaucrats and especially judges would have you believe that too much freedom will result in chaos. Therefore, we should gladly give up some RIGHTS for the betterment of government.  In other words, people acting in the name of government, say we need more laws and more JURORS to enforce these laws - even if we have to give up some more RIGHTS in the process.  They believe the more laws we have, the more control, thus a better society.  This theory may sound good on paper, and apparently many of our 'leaders' think this way, as evidenced by the thousands of new laws that are added to the books each year in this country.  But, no matter how cleverly this Marxist argument is made, the hard fact is that whenever you give up a RIGHT you lose a ‘FREE CHOICE’!
This adds another control. Control's real name is BONDAGE!  The logical conclusion would be, if giving up some RIGHTS, produces a better society, then by giving up all RIGHTS we could produce the perfect society.  We could chain everybody to a tree, for lack of TRUST.  This may prevent a crime, but it would destroy PRIVACY, which is the heartbeat of FREEDOM!  It would also destroy TRUST which is the foundation for DIGNITY.  Rather than giving up RIGHTS, we should be giving up wrongs!  The opposite of control is not chaos.  More laws do not make less criminals!  We must give up wrongs, not rights, for a better society!  William Penn of the British House of Commons, once proclaimed, ‘Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human liberty; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.’

UNALIENABLE OR NATURAL RIGHTS!
NATURAL RIGHTS ARE THOSE RIGHTS such as LIFE (from conception), LIBERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS e.g. FREEDOM of RELIGION, SPEECH, LEARNING, TRAVEL, SELF-DEFENSE, ETC.  Hence laws and statutes which violate NATURAL RIGHTS, though they have the color of law, are not law but imposters!  The U.S. Constitution was written to protect these NATURAL RIGHTS from being tampered with by legislators.  Further, Our Forefathers also wisely knew that the U.S. Constitution would be utterly worthless to restrain government legislators unless it was clearly understood that the people had the right to compel the government to keep within the Constitutional limits.

In a jury trial the real judges are the JURORS!  Surprisingly, judges are actually just referees bound by the Constitution!

Lysander Spooner in his book Essay on the Trial by Jury wrote as follows:
"Government is established for the protection of the weak against the strong. This is the principal, if not the sole motive for the establishment of all legitimate government.  It is only the weaker party that loses their liberties, when a government becomes oppressive.  The stronger party, in all governments, is free by virtue of their superior strength.  They never oppress themselves.  Legislation is the work of the stronger party; and if, in addition to the sole power of legislation, they have the sole power of determining what legislation shall be enforced, they have all power in their hands, and the weaker party is the subjects of an absolute government. Unless the weaker party have a veto, they have no power whatever in the government and ...no liberties...The trial by jury is the only institution that gives the weaker party any veto power upon the power of the stronger. Consequently it is the only institution that gives them any effective voice in the government, or any guaranty against oppression."  The Complete TEXT of The Essay on the Trial by Jury is HERE

JURY TAMPERING?
A JURY'S Rights, Powers and Duties:
The Charge to the JURY in the First JURY Trial before the [s]upreme Court of the United States illustrates the TRUE POWER OF THE JURY.  In the February term of 1794, the supreme (Supreme is not capitalized in the Constitution, however Behavior is. Art. III) Court conducted a JURY trial and said: "...it is presumed, that the juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the other hand, presumed that the courts are the best judges of law.  But still both objects are within your power of decision."

"You have a right to take upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy."  (State of Georgia v. Brailsford, et al, 3 Dall 1).

"The JURY has an unreviewable and unreversible power...to aquit in disregard of the instructions on the law given by the trial judge..." U.S. v. Dougherty, 473 F 2nd 1113, 1139, (1972).

Hence, JURY disregard to the limited and generally conviction-oriented evidence presented for its consideration, and JURY disregard for what the trial judge wants them to believe is the controlling law in any particular case  (sometimes referred to as ‘JURY lawlessness’ {jury lawlessness means willingness to nullify bad law}) is not something to be scrupulously avoided, but rather encouraged.  Witness the following quotation from the eminent legal authority above mentioned: “Jury lawlessness is the greatest corrective of law in its actual administration.  The will of the state at large imposed on a reluctant community, the will of a majority imposed on a vigorous and determined minority, find the same obstacle in the local JURY that formerly confronted kings and ministers.” Dougherty, cited above, note 32 at 1130.

The Right of the JURY to be Told
of Its Power
Almost every JURY in the land is falsely instructed by the judge when it is told it must accept as the law that which is given to them by the court, and that the JURY can decide only the facts in the case.  This is to destroy the purpose of a Common Law JURY, and to permit the imposition of tyranny upon the people.
"There is nothing more terrifying than ignorance in action."  Goethe engraved on a plaque at the Naval War College
"To embarrass justice by a multiplicity of laws, or to hazard it by confidence in judges, are the opposite rocks on which all civil institutions have been wrecked." Johnson - engraved in the Minnesota State Capitol Outside the Supreme Court Chambers
"...The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." II Corinthians 3:6
"It is error alone which needs the support of government.  Truth can stand by itself." Thomas Jefferson
The JURY'S options are by no means limited to the choices presented to it in the courtroom. "The jury gets its understanding as to the arrangements in the legal system from more than one voice.  There is the formal communication from the 'judge'.  There is the informal communication from the total culture - literature, current comment, conversation; and, of course, history and tradition."Dougherty, cited above, at 1135.

LAWS, FACTS AND EVIDENCE!
Without the power to decide what facts, law and evidence are applicable.  JURIES cannot be a protection to the accused.  If people acting in the name of government are permitted by JURORS to dictate any law whatever, they can also unfairly dictate what evidence is admissible or inadmissible and thereby prevent the WHOLE TRUTH from being considered.  Thus if government can manipulate and control both the law and evidence, the issue of fact becomes virtually irrelevant.  In reality, true JUSTICE would be denied leaving us with a trial by government and not a trial by JURY!

HOW DOES TYRANNY BEGIN?
WHY ARE THERE SO MANY LAWS?
Heroes are men of glory who are so honored because of some heroic deed.  People often out of gratitude yield allegiance to them.  Honor and allegiance are nice words for power!  Power and allegiance can only be held rightfully by trust as a result of continued character.
When people acting in the name of government violate ethics, they break trust with ‘WE THE PEOPLE.’  The natural result is for ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ to pull back power (honor and allegiance).
The loss of power creates fear for those losing the power.  Fearing the loss of power, people acting in the name of government often seek to regain or at least hold their power.  Hence, to legitimatize their quest for control, laws and force are often instituted.
Unchecked power is the foundation of tyranny.  It is the JUROR'S duty to use the JURY ROOM as a vehicle to stem the tide of oppression and tyranny: To prevent bloodshed by peacefully removing power from those who have abused it.  The JURY is the primary vehicle for the peaceable restoration of LIBERTY, POWER AND HONOR TO ‘WE THE PEOPLE!’
YOUR VOTE COUNTS!
Your vote of NOT GUILTY must be respected by all other members of the JURY - it is the RIGHT and the DUTY of a JUROR to Never, Never, NEVER yield his or her sacred vote - for you are not there as a fool, merely to agree with the majority, but as an officer of the court and a qualified judge in your own right.  Regardless of the pressures or abuses that may be heaped on you by any other members of the JURY with whom you may in good conscience disagree, you can await the reading of the verdict secure in the knowledge you have voted your own conscience and convictions - and not those of someone else.  YOU ARE NOT A RUBBER STAMP!
By what logic do we send our youth to battle tyranny on foreign soil, while we refuse to do so in our courts?  Did you know that many of the planks of the ‘Communist Manifesto’ are now represented by law in the U.S.?  How is it possible for Americans to denounce communism and practice it simultaneously?
The JURY judges the Spirit, Motive and Intent of both the law and the Accused, whereas the prosecutor only represents the letter of the law.
Therein lies the opportunity for the accomplishment of LIBERTY and JUSTICE for ALL.  If you, and numerous other JURORS throughout the State and Nation begin and continue to bring in verdicts of NOT GUILTY in such cases where a man-made statute is defective or oppressive, these statutes will become as ineffective as if they had never been written.
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace.  We ask not your counsels or your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.  May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were out countrymen." Samuel Adams

Section II
GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!
PATRICK HENRY SHOCKED!
Young Christian attorney Patrick Henry saw why a JURY of PEERS is so vital to FREEDOM!  It was March 1775 when he rode into a small town of Culpepper, Virginia.  He was totally shocked by what he saw!  There, in the middle of the town square was a minister tied to a whipping post, his back laid bare and bloody with the bones of his ribs showing.  He had been scourged mercilessly like JESUS, with whips laced with metal.
Patrick Henry is quoted as saying: "When they stopped beating him, I could see the bones of his rib cage.  I turned to someone and asked what the man had done to deserve such a beating as this."
SCOURGED FOR NOT TAKING A LICENSE!
The reply given him was that the man being scourged was a minister who refused to take a license.  He was one of twelve who were locked in jail because they refused to take a license.  A license often becomes an arbitrary control by government that makes a crime out of what ordinarily would not be a crime.  IT TURNS A RIGHT INTO A PRIVILEGE!  Three days later they scourged him to death.
This was the incident which sparked Christian attorney Patrick Henry to write the famous words which later became the rallying cry of the Revolution.  "What is it that Gentlemen wish?  What would they have?  Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?  Forbid it, Almighty God!  I know no what course others may take, but as for me, GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!" (view complete speech here)  Later he made this part of his famous speech at Saint John's Episcopal Church in Williamsburg, Virginia.

JURY OF PEERS
Our Forefathers felt that in order to have JUSTICE, it was obvious that a JURY of ‘PEERS’ must be people who actually know the defendant.  How else would they be able to judge motive and intent?
‘PEERS’ of the defendant, like the rights of the JURY have also been severely tarnished.  Originally, it meant people of ‘equals in station and rank.’ (Black's Law Dictionary, 1910), ‘freeholders of a neighborhood,’ (Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1886), or a ‘A companion; a fellow; an associate.’ (Webster's 1828 Dictionary of the English Language).

WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO SIT ON A JURY?
Patrick Henry, along with others, was deeply concerned as to who has a right to sit on a JURY.  Listen to Our Forefather's wisdom on the subject of ‘PEERS’.
MR.HENRY
"By the bill of rights of England, a subject has a right to a trial by his peers.  What is meant by his peers?  Those who reside near him, his neighbors, and who are well acquainted with his character and situation in life."   Patrick Henry, (Elliot, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, 3:579).
Patrick Henry also knew that originally the JURY of PEERS was designed as a protection for Neighbors from outside governmental oppression.  Henry states the following, "Why do we love this trial by jury?  Because it prevents the hand of oppression from cutting you off...This gives me comfort - that, as long as I have existence, my neighbors will protect me." (Elliot, 3:545, 546)
MR.HOLMES
Mr. Holmes, from Massachusetts, argued strenuously that for JUSTICE to prevail, the case must be heard in the vicinity where the fact was committed by a JURY of PEERS. "...a jury of the peers would, from their local situation, have an opportunity to form a judgment of the CHARACTER of the person charged with the crime, and also to judge of the CREDIBILITY of the witnesses." (Elliot, 2:110).
MR.WILSON
Mr. Wilson, signer of ‘The unanimous Declaration,’ who also later became a supreme Court Justice, stressed the importance of the JUROR'S knowing personally both the defendant and the witnesses. "Where jurors can be acquainted with the characters of the parties and the witnesses - where the whole cause can be brought within their knowledge and their view - I know no mode of investigation equal to that by a trial by jury: they hear every thing that is alleged; they not only hear the words, but they see and mark the features of the countenance; they can judge of weight due to such testimony; and moreover, it is a cheap and expeditious manner of distributing justice.  There is another advantage annexed to the trial by jury; the jurors may indeed return a mistaken or ill-founded verdict, but their errors cannot be systematical." (Elliot, 2:516).
FREEDOM FOR WILLIAM PENN
"Those people who are not governed by GOD will be ruled by tyrants."  William Penn
Edward Bushell and three fellow JURORS learned this lesson well.  They refused to bow to the court. They believed in the absolute power of the JURY, though their eight companions cowered to the court.  The four JURORS spent nine weeks of torture in prison, often without food or water, soaked with urine, smeared with feces, barely able to stand, and even threatened with fines, yet they would not give in to the judge.  Edward Bushell said, "My liberty is not for sale," though he had great wealth and commanded an international shipping enterprise.  These ‘bumble-heads’, so the court thought, proved the power of the people was stronger than any power of government.  They emerged total victors.

THE FIRST AMENDMENT
The year was 1670, and the case Bushell sat on was that of William Penn, who was on trial for violation of the ‘Coventicle Act.’  This was an elaborate Act which made the Church of England the only legal church.  The Act was struck down by their not guilty vote.  Freedom of Religion was established and became part of the English Bill of Rights and later it became the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.  In addition, the Right to peaceful assembly was founded. Freedom of Speech, and also habeas corpus.  The first such writ of habeas corpus ever issued by the Court of Common Pleas was used to free Edward Bushell.  Later this trial gave birth to the concept of Freedom of the press.
Had Bushell and his colleagues yielded to the guilty verdict sought by the judge and prosecutor, William Penn most likely would have been executed, as he clearly broke the law.

HE BROKE THE LAW!
Then there would have been no Liberty Bell, no Independence Hall, no city of Philadelphia, and no state called Pennsylvania, for young William Penn, founder of Pennsylvania, and leader of the Quakers, was on trial for his life.  His alleged crime was preaching and teaching a different view of the Bible than that of the Church of England.  This appears innocent today, but then, one could be executed for such actions.  He believed in freedom of religion, freedom of speech and the right to peaceful assembly.  He had broken the government's law, but he had injured no one.  Those four heroic JURORS knew that only when actual injury to someone's person or property takes place is there a real crime.  No law is broken when no injury can be shown.  Thus there can be no loss or termination of rights unless actual damage is proven.  Many imposter laws were repealed as a result of this case.

IT IS ALMOST UNFAIR!
This trial made such an impact that every colony but one established the jury as the first liberty to maintain all other liberties.  It was felt that the liberties of people could never be wholly lost as long as the jury remained strong and independent, and that unjust laws and statutes could not stand when confronted by conscientious JURORS.  JURORS today face an avalanche of imposter laws. JURORS not only still have the power and the RIGHT, but also the DUTY, to nullify bad laws by voting ‘not guilty’.  At first glance it appears that it is almost unfair, the power JURORS have over government, but necessary when considering the historical track record of oppression that governments have wielded over private Citizens.

JEFFERSON'S WARNINGS!
In 1789 Thomas Jefferson warned that the judiciary if given too much power might ruin our REPUBLIC, and destroy our BILL OF RIGHTS!
"The new Constitution has secured these [individual rights] in the Executive and Legislative departments; but not in the Judiciary.  It should have established trials by the people themselves, that is to say, by jury."
The Judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric.." (1820)
"...the Federal Judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scarecrow), working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little to-day and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the States, and the government of all be consolidated into one....when all government...in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the centre of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government which we separated.  (1821)
"The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the legislative and executive also in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch."
"...judges should be withdrawn from the bench whose erroneous biases are leading us to dissolution.  It may, indeed, injure them in fame or fortune, but it saves the Republic..."

Section III
INDEX TO THE
ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS
GENERAL INDEX TO:
THE UNANIMOUS DECLARATION
I. Need to dissolve certain political relationships.
II. Need to assume powers which Our Creator entitles man.
III. Declaring separation from unjust government.
IV. Self-evident truths elaborated.
A. All men are created equal.
B. Our Creator gives to each unalienable Rights.
1. Life, Liberty, Happiness, property, safety, respect, privacy, etc.
C. The purpose of government is to protect the weak from the strong.
D. Right and duty to abolish bad government.
1. Fact: The War of Independence was not out of rebellion by the colonies, but rather England rebelled against The Divine Laws by repeated injuries of usurpation and tyranny. The young colonies were forced to defend themselves against the King George III's tyranny.
a. eg. Bad laws, bad courts, police state (swarms of soldiers), taxes without consent, deprived of trial by jury, deporting people for trial. England declared the colonies out of their protection, rights of individuals were plundered.
b. The colonies repeatedly petitioned England, but only received repeated injury.
c. England was warned from time to time.
d. England was deaf to the voice of justice.
V. The colonies appealed to Our Creator, the Supreme Judge of the world.
VI. The colonies right to be free and independent.
VII. Under the protection of Our Creator they pledged their lives, fortunes and sacred honor.

GENERAL INDEX TO:
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
Preamble: The people hold the power, "We the people...in order to form a more perfect union...and secure the blessings of liberty..."
ARTICLE I
SECTION:
1. Legislative powers.
2. House of representatives; qualification of members; apportionment of representatives and direct taxes; census; first apportionment; vacancies; officers of the house; impeachments.
3. Senate: classification of senators; qualifications of; vice president to preside; other officers; trial of impeachments.
4. Election of members of congress; time assembling of congress.
5. Powers of each house; punishment for disorderly Behaviour; journal; adjournments.
6. Compensation and privileges; disabilities of members.
7. Revenue bills; passage and approval of bills; orders and resolutions.
8. General powers of congress; borrowing of money; regulations of commerce; naturalization and bankruptcy; money; weights and measures; counterfeiting; post offices; patents and copyrights; inferior courts; piracies and felonies; war; marquee and reprisal; armies; navy; land and naval forces; calling the militia; District of Columbia; to enact laws necessary to enforce the Constitution.
9. Limitations of congress; immigration; writ of habeas corpus; bills of attainder and ex post facto laws prohibited; direct taxes; exports not to be taxed; interstate shipping; drawing money from the treasury; financial statements to be published; titles of nobility and favors from foreign powers prohibited.
10. Limitations of the individual states; no treaties; letters of marquee and reprisal; no coining of money; bills of credit; not allowed to make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a tender in payment of debts; no bills of attainder; ex post facto Law or law impairing the obligation of contracts; no titles of nobility; state imposts and duties; further restrictions on state powers.

ARTICLE II
SECTION:
1. Executive powers; electors; qualifications; vacancy; compensation and Oath of the president.
2. Powers and duties of the president, making of treaties; power of appointment.
3. Other powers and duties.
4. All government officers are liable to impeachment.

 ARTICLE III
SECTION:
1. Judicial powers; all judges must have good Behavior to stay in office; compensation not to be diminished.
2. Jurisdiction of federal courts and supreme Court; trials for crimes by jury except impeachment.
3. Treason defined; trial for and punishment.

ARTICLE IV
SECTION:
1. Message to the states; each state is to give full faith and credit to public acts and records of other states.
2. Citizens of each state shall be entitled, fleeing from justice.
3. Admission of new states, power of congress over territories.
4. Republican form of government guaranteed to every state; protection from invasion or domestic violence.
ARTICLE V
SECTION:
1. Amending the Constitution.
ARTICLE VI
SECTION:
1. National obligations; Public debt; Constitution to be the supreme Law of the land; Constitutional Oath of office; no religious test required.

ARTICLE VII
SECTION:
1. Ratification of the Constitution; George Washington signs as Twelfth-Hindi, the highest rank in Saxon government, e.g., He was the equal of 1200 King Georges, or you as a juror are equal to 1200 presidents, congressmen or judges, local, federal or the supreme Court.

GENERAL INDEX TO
THE BILL OF RIGHTS

and Amendments
PREAMBLE:
Limiting the federal government: An expressed desire to prevent abuse of federal powers!
ARTICLES - COMMON LAW
I. Religious freedom, both to an establishment as well as the free exercise thereof; freedom of speech, press; right of petition.
II. Right to bear arms.
III. Quartering of soldiers.
IV. The right to privacy and security against unreasonable searches and seizures: search warrants.
V. Grand Jury, double jeopardy, no one must witness against himself, no loss of life, liberty or private property without due process.
VI. Speedy and public trials, impartial jury; nature and cause, right to confront; compulsory witnesses, assistance of Counsel - (note: does not say attorney.)
VII. Right to trial by jury according to the rules of common law - (note: Ten Commandments are the foundation of Common Law.)
VIII. Excessive bail, fines, punishment etc. prohibited,
IX. Rights beyond Bill of Rights belong to the people.
X. Undelegated powers belong to the people unless given by the people to the states.
Articles I-X were proposed September 25th, 1789, and ratified December 15th, 1791.
AMENDMENTS - EQUITY LAW
XI. Restriction of judicial powers, proposed March 5th 1794, adopted January 8th, 1798.
XII. Manner of electing the president and vice president, proposed December 12th 1803, adopted September 25th, 1804.
XIII. Slavery and involuntary servitude prohibited, took effect * December 18th 1865.
XIV. Citizenship and status defined, privilege of 2nd, 3rd, or whatever status of citizenship one selects for oneself, as opposed to Freeholder with full sovereign rights: apportionment of representatives; who is prohibited from holding office; public debt. CAUTION: There is serious doubt as to the legality of this amendment because of the manner of ratification which was highly suspect.  At least 10 States were held by force of arms until the proper authorities agreed to vote for this amendment.  An excellent overview of this was written by the Utah Supreme Court 439 Pacific Reporter 2nd Series pgs 266-276, and for a more detailed account of how the 14th amendment was forced upon the Nation see articles in 11 S.C.L.Q. 484 and 28 Tul. L. Rev. 22, took effect July 28th, 1868.
XV. Non Freeholders given right to vote, took effect March 30th, 1870.
XVI. Income tax, took effect February 25th, 1913, possible only four States ratified it properly.
XVII. Direct elections of senators; electors; vacancies in the senate, took effect May 31st, 1913.  This moved us from a complete Republic to a simple republic much like the style of government of the Soviet Union.  States rights were lost and we were plunged headlong into a democracy of which our forefathers warned was the vilest form of government because it always ends in oppression.
XVIII. Prohibition of liquor traffic, took effect January 29th, 1920.
XIX. Voting for women, took effect August 27th, 1920.
XX. Terms of the president, vice president, senators and representatives; date of assembling of congress, vacancies of the president, power of the congress in presidential succession, took effect February 6th, 1933.
XXI. Eighteen Article (Prohibition) repealed, took effect December 5th, 1933.
XXII. Limits of the presidential term, took effect March 1st, 1951.
XXIII. Electors for the District of Columbia, took effect April 3rd, 1961
XXIV. Failure to pay any tax does not deny one the right to vote, took effect February 23rd, 1964.
XXV. Filling the office of the president or vice president during a vacancy, took effect February 23rd, 1967.
XXVI. Right to vote at 18, took effect July 5th 1971.
*  Took effect is used as there is a great deal of suspicion as to the nature of these amendments (common law verses equity), also whether these last 16 amendments are legal, how many were ratified correctly, do they create a federal constitution in opposition to the original, etc. For further studies a good place to begin is with the article by the Utah Supreme Court on the 14th Amendment. 439 Pacific Reporter 2d Series, pgs. 266-276, and Senate Document 240.

JURY:...Petty Juries, consisting usually of twelve men, attend courts to try matters of fact in civil causes, and to decide both the law and the fact in criminal prosecutions.  The decision of a petty jury is called a verdict.. American Dictionary of the English Language by Noah Webster 1828
PROCLAIM LIBERTY! Inscribed on our hallowed LIBERTY BELL are these words " Proclaim LIBERTY Throughout all the Land unto all the Inhabitants Thereof." –  Lev. XXV X
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." George Washington
"Woe to those who decree unjust statutes and to those who continually record unjust decisions, to deprive the needy of justice, and to rob the poor of My people of their rights..." Isaiah 10:1-2
"My people are destroyed for the lack of knowledge...!" Hosea 4:6
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke 1729-1797
"If My people which are called by My name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from Heaven, and will forgive their sins, and will heal their land." II Chronicles 7:14
"We must obey GOD rather than men." Acts 5:29

NOW IT'S YOUR TURN!
You - as a juror - armed merely with the knowledge of what a COMMON LAW JURY really is and what your Common Law Rights, Powers and Duties really are, can do more to re-establish ‘liberty and social justice for all’ in this State and ultimately throughout all of the United States than all our Senators and Representatives put together.  WHY?  Because even without the concurrence of all of your fellow jurors, in a criminal trial, you, with your single vote of ‘NOT GUILTY’ can nullify every rule of ‘law’ that is not in accordance with the principles of natural, God-given, Common Law and Constitutional Law.  It is precisely this power of nullification, i.e., nullifying a bad law that makes the trial by JURY one of our most important RIGHTS.  Along with the Second Amendment, it can protect and preserve all of us Citizen's other RIGHTS.

Want more information on this subject? Then check this out...


THAT’S WHY…

On 04 NOVEMBER…there’s no excuse…
 IT’S YOUR CHOICE…
TO CHANGE THINGS FOR THE BETTER!

Just say ‘NO’ to those who want to keep this county in Poverty & Pauperism
– and –
Just say ‘YES’ to real Progress & Prosperity for the future!

On Primary Day – YOU have a chance to elect two persons that will always put YOU first!  They know that:

THE GREATER COMMON GOOD ALWAYS COMES BEFORE SELF OR ANY SELF-SERVING SPECIAL INTERESTS!

Keep up to Date – Stay tuned to these Websites:




   On 04 NOVEMBER it doesn’t matter how you are registered – YOU CAN VOTE for:

CHARLES WILFONG – ND
&
NORMAN LEE ALDERMAN - SD

The Pocahontas Crier is an independent Internet News Service that has now endorsed
two candidates for County Commission
      CHARLES WILFONG & NORMAN LEE ALDERMAN  
in addition to providing in depth news reporting on important issues directly affecting the Citizens of Pocahontas County!

Email comments & suggestions to: pocahontascrier88@gmail.com  

The Pocahontas Crier is a free, non-subscription, Internet News Service meant for entertainment in the true iconoclastic ‘muckraking’ tradition of questioning authority, challenging corruption, and offering Common Sense Alternatives for The Greater Common Good before Self or any Special Interests!  We struggle for Social Justice on all levels and are part of The Crier Coalition of Internet News Services comprised of The Pocahontas Commentator, The Pocahontas Crier, Signal Fires of WV, Rolling Thunder &  Echoes from the Holl’r.